It seems that every time I look into the racial history of
the US, I learn something that is disturbing. From the horrible treatment that
befell the black population following the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation,
through the treachery of the courts, Jim Crow laws, and the evil and often
illegal swindle that big city realtors perpetrated against unknowing migrants
from the south, during the 1920s and 1940s. These people have been treated
shabbily by the very elements of American society that should have stood
shoulder to shoulder with them.
The fate of black men convicted in white courts has been
particularly foul. In many cases black prisoners were given much longer
sentences for essentially the same crimes as white prisoners. In the South, for
example, a black man might be sentenced to twenty or thirty years for a crime
that a white guy would get probation for. When I was a boy I lived in a small
town in northern California. A highway ran in front the farmhouse and on the
other side of the highway was a railroad track. Across the highway from the
house there was a trestle that allowed a stream to pass by. The RR carried many
migrants from SoCal to farming locations in the northern parts of the state, as
well as Oregon and Washington, then back again when the picking season was
over.
I met a lot of migrants – white, black, mostly Mexicans. And
mostly they were nice people; people just trying to get by, but they seemed
okay with the lives they had chosen for themselves. On many occasions I heard
adults complain of the “nine-to-five” routine, having to put up with a nasty
boss – you know the routine. And there were those who knew no other life. I
even met a number of hobos – one became a good friend of my dad – who talked
about giving up a life of wealth and privilege, in order to be free of
responsibilities and, most especially, groveling family members. (True, I’m not
sure I believed them all, but there were a couple whose stories rang true.)
But I digress. One
evening on my way back from fishing over at the creek I came upon a black
family making camp under the trestle. I greeted them as I always greeted
visitors. They were friendly and we started talking about this and that. There
were three of them, one an elderly man; there was a young woman in her
twenties, and a boy about my age – about 10. The old man had trouble moving,
shuffling when he walked, and he looked, oh, so dreadfully old, though I was
told he was only in his fifties. He had no teeth, his eyes were blank, showing
no emotion at all, and there were many scars on his face and hands. But the
clothes he wore were brand new – an incongruous combination, if I ever saw one.
His shoes were also new but he didn’t like wearing them and had taken them off,
in favor of going barefoot. I don’t think there was a straight toe on either
foot; they were horribly bent and gnarled, some were missing.
The woman, who I learned was his daughter, and whose name,
if I remember rightly, was Daphne, noticed me looking at them. She said her
dad, whom she introduced as (again if I remember true) was Samuel Williamson,
had been in San Quentin State Prison for 22 years. His crime? He walked to a
store to buy some milk for Daphne (who was two at the time. This was in the
middle of the Depression). On the way he was beaten up and robbed of the nickel
that he would use to buy a quart of milk. He managed to make his way to the
store and sat for a while on a chair outside. When he felt better, he went in
the store and, when the storekeeper turned his back, Sam stuffed a loaf of
bread under his coat and made his way to the door. I storekeeper saw him steal
the bread and immediately called the cops. Sam was arrested and thrown,
roughly, into jail. He was charged with robbery (the proper charge – if Sam was
white – was petit theft). Where he should have been sent to jail for a few days
or a week, Samuel Williamson was sent to state prison for 25 years! (There are
many instances of this kind of injustice, mostly brought to bear on black
defendants. But, in those days, long sentences were typical for even
non-violent crimes. There were few liberal judges in the first half of the
century.)
Prisons, when Sam Williamson became an inmate, were not
known as country clubs. Guards and even other inmates could be tough, even
brutal. From what Daphne said, her father was a rough and tumble guy, not one
to take a lot of crap off anyone, and, as such, suffered serious abuse from guards
and prisoners, who would gang up on him. Also, he was seriously pissed off over
being sent to prison for the crime of stealing a loaf of bread to feed his
starving family. Sam had plenty to be mad about and he found his circumstances
difficult to live with: he raged against it – who can blame him? When the time
came for Sam to be set free, he was a mere shell of his former self. The poor
man could barely walk. (Daphne said several guards shackled her father and beat
his feet with nightsticks – the reason his toes were so deformed.) The three were
homeless and going to look for work picking tomatoes in Oregon.
I have never been in favor of reparations for blacks or anybody
else, for that matter. I’d always envisioned the prospect of people uninvolved
with the “crime” paying people who suffered not at all (such as the reparations
Germany paid Israel after WWII and the Holocaust). But over the years, learning
more about the ways blacks were brutalized at the hands of racist and unscrupulous
whites, I’ve arrived at the conclusion that there are some instances in which
reparations are called for. Those would be to those who were slaves (of which
there are none) and those who were systematically robbed by the criminal activities
of whites. This would include, but is not limited to, the real estate swindles
occurring in the big cities during the forties, fifties and sixties. Black
people were lied to, stolen from and outright defrauded while believing they were
participating in the American Dream – owning their own home. (You can read about this at The Atlantic website:
theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631.
These people should be reimbursed for the fraud they
endured, but the money should come from those who stole it in the first place. I
would think that the serial payment of reparations (i.e. monthly installments) could
easily become yet another system of social welfare. Unfortunately, a group of real
estate fraud victims was defeated in a jury trial. Apparently, there will be no
justice for those who suffered at the hands of crooked whites. Maybe things
haven’t changed much after all.
It is ironic that the black population has for years and
years stood behind the Democrat Party and its promises of reform for the plight
they suffer. And for years and years the Democrats have done nothing. The
plight of the black population may be somewhat better for some – I see more and
more blacks in TV commercials and TV shows. The affirmative action rampant in
professional sports is certainly an attraction for the athletically inclined. I’ve
never believed there are so few white athletes capable of playing at the
professional level as we see in pro football and pro basketball. Years ago in
an interview Michael Jordan made a passing reference – though I doubt he’d own
up to it now – to the penchant of college and professional coaches and scouts
to almost always choose a black athlete over a white one. He said he didn’t
think it was right. And he’s right. It isn’t. Isn’t this a form of reparations?
Just last year it was pointed out to a group of black businessmen that three of
the five starters on the Minnesota Timberwolves basketball team were white. It
became an issue of great concern to them. They vowed to look into it – because it
didn’t sound right. I don’t not know how it turned out. Sorry.
The sad part in all of this is that the Democrat Party has
failed to lift the black population from poverty, as promised over many years.
(Democrats would rather have the issue to pound down the collective public
throat every four years than do anything to remedy the problem). Now we have a Democrat
president who is not the least bit interested in lifting anything. He wants to
kick the legs out from under the white population and level the playing field
that way. Rather than lift everybody up, he wants to let everybody down. Well,
he’s doing a good job of it. And remember, he still has a year in office. Good
luck.
No comments:
Post a Comment